Logan, UT-ID Metro Area

Logan, UT-ID · Metro Area

155,102Population

A metropolitan statistical area of 2 counties (1 central, 1 outlying). The counties are tied together by commuting: people live in one and work in another.

Median household income: $81,126
Median home value: $436,800
Land area: 1,828 sq mi

Market now

Counties in this metro area

Central counties hold the urban core; outlying counties are linked to it by commuting.

County	Role	Population	Median income	Median home value
Cache County, UT	Central	140,046	$81,665	$444,400
Franklin County, ID	Outlying	15,056	$71,950	$372,600

Largest cities and towns

30 places in our city pages lie in this area; the 25 largest are shown.

Place	Type	Population	Median income
Logan, UT	City	54,907	$60,687
Smithfield, UT	City	14,408	$97,537
North Logan, UT	City	11,460	$89,891
Hyrum, UT	City	10,401	$88,725
Providence, UT	City	8,947	$118,072
Nibley, UT	City	7,952	$108,072
Preston, ID	City	5,928	$61,039
Hyde Park, UT	City	5,540	$113,102
Wellsville, UT	City	4,157	$104,351
Richmond, UT	City	3,000	$110,428
Lewiston, UT	City	2,408	$98,583
River Heights, UT	City	2,282	$117,708
Millville, UT	City	1,800	$114,773
Benson, UT	CDP	1,776	$93,194
Mendon, UT	City	1,482	$148,261
Franklin, ID	City	1,034	$81,830
Clifton, ID	City	788	$89,583
Newton, UT	Town	756	$81,000
Paradise, UT	Town	679	$109,688
Clarkston, UT	Town	623	$75,208
Weston, ID	City	569	$88,462
Trenton, UT	Town	526	$95,313
Cove, UT	CDP	521	—
Amalga, UT	Town	511	$97,679
Dayton, ID	City	500	$82,083

Demographic Rates

Poverty Rate

11.5%

Unemployment

2.6%

College Educated

40.2%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table S1701, S2301, S1501

Race & Ethnicity

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table B02001, B03003

Income Profile

Median Household Income

$81,126

Mean Household Income

$104,726

Income Distribution

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table S1901, S1902, S1903, B19013, B19113

Sex Distribution

Male

50.4%

Female

49.6%

Population Split

Male50.4%

Female49.6%

The sex distribution of a population provides insight into the demographic balance of a community. Significant skews in this ratio can be influenced by local industries (e.g., military bases, mining, or tech hubs), educational institutions, or migration patterns. Understanding this balance is essential for planning public health initiatives and social services.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table S0101

Ancestry

English32.3%

German9.4%

Mexican8.0%

Irish4.8%

Scottish4.0%

Italian1.9%

French1.6%

Polish0.5%

African0.4%

Reported ancestry groups representing the cultural heritage of the population. Percentages may not sum to 100% as residents may report multiple ancestries or none.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table B04006

Immigration & Nativity

Nativity Status

6.0%Foreign Born

94.0%Native Born

Citizenship Status

Naturalized41.9%

Non-Citizen58.1%

Period of Entry

2010 or Later35.9%

Before 201064.1%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table B05001, B05002

Housing Characteristics

Total Housing Units

51,877

Median Rent

$1,201/mo

Median Home Value

$436,800

Median Year Built

1991

Housing Tenure

Housing Types

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table DP04

Education Enrollment

Total Enrolled

57,144

College Enrollment

33.3%

High School

17.6%

College Educated

40.2%

K-12 Enrollment

Higher Education

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table S1401, S1501

Transportation & Commute

Mean Commute Time

18.3 min

Drive Alone Rate

68.4%

Public Transit

2.1%

Work From Home

13.8%

Commute Mode

Vehicle Ownership

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table S0801, B08141

Age Distribution

Under 18

29.3%

18-34 Years

31.7%

35-64 Years

28.5%

65+ Years

10.5%

Population Composition

Under 1829.3%

18-3431.7%

35-6428.5%

65+10.5%

The age distribution of a community impacts local services, school requirements, and the labor market. A higher percentage of youth suggests a need for schools and family services, while a larger senior population may indicate a retirement destination or a need for healthcare services.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table S0101

Household Composition

Married Couples

65.1%

Single Parent

4.3%

Living Alone

15.2%

Avg Size

3.05

Household Types

Married Couples65.1%

Single Parent4.3%

Living Alone15.2%

Household composition offers insights into the social fabric of a community. A high percentage of married couples often correlates with stability and higher household incomes, while a significant number of single-person households may indicate a younger transient population or an aging community.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table S1101

Economic Profile

Per Capita Income

$33,590

SNAP Usage

4.9%

Health Insurance

93.0%

Household Income Breakdown

Under $25k9.4%

$25k - $50k18.8%

$50k - $100k32.9%

$100k+38.9%

Key Industries

Manufacturing

17.7%

Retail Trade

11.2%

Education & Health Care

24.1%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table S1901, S2201, DP03

Health & Disability

Disability Rate

9.0%With Disability

Percentage of the civilian noninstitutionalized population with a disability.

Health Insurance Coverage

93.0%With Coverage

Percentage of the civilian noninstitutionalized population with health insurance coverage.

Why this matters: High disability rates may indicate a need for accessible infrastructure and specialized healthcare services. Health insurance coverage is a key indicator of a community's access to preventative care and financial resilience against medical emergencies.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table S1810, S2701

Technology Access

Broadband Internet

93.3%vs ~90% National Avg

Computer Ownership

98.0%vs ~95% National Avg

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2020–2024) • Table S2801

Cost of Living & Housing

Cost of Living Scale

Lower is better

95.9

0130

Below average< 97

Near average97 - 103

Above average> 103

Prices compared with the US average (100). 105 means about 5% more expensive than average.

Housing Affordability

Higher is better

86.2

0200

Hard to Afford< 80

Moderate80 - 100

Affordable> 100

100 means a family earning the median family income just qualifies to buy the median-value home (20% down, 30-year loan at 6.72%).

Source: BEA Regional Price Parities · NAR affordability formula with Census ACS 2020–2024 incomes and home values and the Freddie Mac 30-year rate (2024)

How can this information help me in marketing?